Build a Broad Left Party, fight for Marxist Unity

Sclerotic archaeo what?
Sclerotic archaeo what?
(Graphic by Josephine Sams)

Phil Hearse made this submission to the April 2013 Socialist Resistance conference. The position it sets out was accepted by the organisation and we’ll be making more of the conference material available shortly. A number of videos can be found here, including greetings from the Anti-Capitalist Initiative, Green Left, the International Socialist Network and Left Unity.

Comrades, we face major opportunities in the next period to help work towards a new broad left party and a refounded Marxist regroupment in this country. The left – and its far left component in particular – is undergoing a profound shake up, the precise contours of which none of us can yet see. The left that comes out of the next two years in England and Wales will look very different to the way its looks now. Our task is to grab that opportunity with both hands.

On the train out of Clapham Junction station you can see the big PCS building on which hangs a huge banner: “Austerity isn’t working, support out alternative”. When even George Osborne’s old buddy, the IMF’s Christine Lagarde is saying the austerity is going too far in the UK, the need for an alternative is obvious. But Labour promises nothing – not a single pledge about the future will they give. Most people don’t know what the PCS’s alternative is: a radical alternative is all but absent from the national political framework.

Ken Loach didn’t launch ‘an appeal’ for a broad left party, it was just an opinion in an Open Democracy interview that an SR supporter put on their website, and it was picked up by Andrew Burgin for Left Unity in a very intelligent way. It was made ‘an appeal’ by popular acclaim. The fact that now more than 7000 people have signed shows the political space that has been opened and which Left Unity has walked in to, without major national political figures heading it up. That’s a disadvantage but also an advantage – Respect was always too beholden the vagaries of George Galloway. But we can now say we have a much better platform to fight for a broad left party.

There is still a long way to go to move towards a real national political party type formation – whether it will call itself a ‘party’ is open for debate and not the crucial issue. The crucial question is how it operates – democratically and not by top down diktat, open to the social movements and mass campaigns and of course standing in local elections. But one thing must be clear from the outset. You must build a national political framework with a name that is known and used in elections. Infinite fronts, committees and local alliances don’t get you that national profile and national recognition.

In any case how does fighting for a broad left party chime in with revolutionary regroupment? Some people will say once you have a broader framework, then why do you need a Marxist organisation? I disagree with that unless you have something like the early SSP experience in which the decisive section of the broad party leadership are the Marxists themselves. The old Militant Labour decided to set up the International Socialist Movement inside the SSP, but it flopped. Everybody asked: why do we have  to go to two meetings a week to discuss the same issues? Of course that’s a nice problem to have in some ways, but it wouldn’t work in England and Wales with a really broad party. Then the organisation of a Marxist trend would be an inevitable and vital development.

It is obvious that there is an objective convergence going on with the ACI and the ISN saying a lot of the same things that we are about revolutionary organisation today. But this moment won’t last: organisations that don’t come together soon find reasons for staying apart.

You could say that Socialist Resistance has prefigured the critique of sclerotic archaeotrotskyism for a long while, but that’s only partly true. It’s true that many of the things said by the AI and ISN have been themes in our politics for a long time – internal democracy, feminism, a less sectarian attitude to the rest of the left – in fact going back to the Fourth International documents on women’s liberation and Socialist Democracy at the 1979 world congress. But other comrades, particularly crystallised in the book by Luke Copper and Simon Hardy (1) have deepened this critique and allowed us to see the crisis of the sect formation in a new and more profound way. They have helped develop our thinking on these things as well.

An exciting prospect

I think that we should adopt the algebraic formula ‘for Marxist unity’ or ‘a united democratic revolutionary organisation’, but the arithmetic content we should for the moment advance is a unification of the AI, ISN and SR as a platform within the Left Unity. A united democratic revolutionary tendency would be a major force for opening up the path to a new broad left party and would be a permanent rebuke to the sects. It would have a powerful attraction within the far left and hopefully be much more capable of opening up a dialogue with radical youth. This is an exciting prospect: it would open up the road to a major renewal of left and revolutionary forces.

It’s a big pity that Counterfire for the moment has not evinced any enthusiasm for Left Unity or for the regroupment process. In the longer term their view can change if the regroupment process takes off. And of course we will be continuing to work with them in the Coalition of Resistance and Stop the War. We should also be supportive of the Firebox initiative and publicise Neil Faulkner’s book (2) etc.

But of course there will be subjective problems at a national and local level. Comrades who’ve been in competing organisations often developed less that comradely personal relations, and indeed the snarling, dismissive and cynical factionalism of the sects is a way their leaderships wall of their members from competing groups and ideas. We have to get over this and see the bigger picture. In particular we have to get over any temptation to have a superior or lecturing attitude because we saw some of these problems earlier.

If we did start thinking about some of these things earlier than others, by the way, it was mainly because of our links with the Fourth International. Our discussions were always heavily influenced by international experiences, for example the Left Bloc in Portugal, the PT and then the PSOL in Brazil, the Communist Refoundation and Sinistra Critica, the RMP is the Philippines etc. I think we should also say the some of us, like me in particular, spent too much time in the 80s and early 90s criticising what comrades elsewhere were doing (although on some questions we were obviously right). In any case we need to change our mindset on the Fourth International profoundly. We should stop regarding this treasure trove of experiences, this invaluable network of revolutionary cadres internationally as our personal property as far as Britain is concerned. The experiences of revolutionary militants internationally in the framework of the Fourth International should become of the common patrimony (matrimony?) of all those committed to building a democratic Marxist unity, not a badge of honour through which we divide ourselves off from others and recruit to ourselves.

The youth camp in Greece is a good opportunity to start this process by the way. I know comrades from the ACI are going and I hope people from the ISN will go as well.


1)   Luke Cooper and Simon Hardy, Beyond Capitalism?, Zero Books 2012

2)   Neil Faulkner, A Marxist History of the World, Pluto Press 2013





  1. I have just viewed the video clips on U tube of the SR conference, Alan Thornett claimed that the second perspective was to improve the gender balance of the organisation.Yet the video clips of women talking about Feminism are labelled in 2 cases only by the name of the speaker; Jane and Jane S and they have far fewer views what does this tell us? The perspective has along way to go perhaps!!

    • The videos on feminism that are currently on the site were not part of the conference, but from a day school the week before. At least one of them had been up on another web site (where I viewed it last week). All three videos were moved to youtube two days later than the other items.

      But I agree that a fuller description explaining what they are would be helpful.

  2. The algebraic and arithmatical formulas outlined by Comrade Hearse seems to have taken a quantum bounce to the other side of the world. The recent unity achieved between the Socialist Alternative (from the ISO tradition) and the Revolutionary Socialist Party (which emerged out of a tradition heavily influenced by the American Socialist Workers Party (Trotskyist), and the deepening discussions between Socialist Alternative and the Socialist Alliance towards unity, is a big step forward for the Australian revolutionary left. I suspect it may also provide some insights into the processes which can be developed for encouraging the kind of comradely discussions between the various components of British revolutionary marxism.

  3. Phil’s emphasis on priority – ‘we thought of it first’ – isn’t very helpful.
    This process is crucial for the left, but we shouldn’t underestimate the difficulties. phil rightly points to the ingrained attitudes almost bread into us to distrust one another. We need to work to overcome this and none of us have copyright on the process.

  4. I suppose I could feel a little flattered that some of the issues I was attempting to raise before I came back to Leicester for a “sulk” are now being addressed. The role of the FI and the extent to which it has developed over the years, remains central. Some comrades in the relatively recent past seemed to be hoping to reconstruct some Trotskyist version of an orthodox church. If that is no longer the case people from outside the FI tradition are more likely to be interested in finding out more.

  5. Hello, That is my piece of artwork being used in the article. I would have more than happily let you of used it but it would have been nice to of been asked and credited in the article. thanks.

4 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Left Unity: Let’s go all the way - AntiCapitalists
  2. Beyond Leninism? - AntiCapitalists
  3. Beyond Leninism? | Post Tenebras Spero Lucem
  4. Twenty Letters To A Friend “Dear Comrades……… | Facing Reality

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.